Ops Workflow Audit · Exhibit 03 · 30-Day Roadmap
Stabilize first, then automate only the safe pieces
The roadmap exhibit from the Ops Workflow Audit: how the client moves from hidden exceptions and founder escalation to a visible operating cadence, then into low-risk automation and implementation support.
Executive roadmap finding
The client can reduce founder escalation without building a new platform.
The first 30 days should install the exception-control layer, define owner rules, create a daily operating cadence, and automate only the low-risk routing and reminder logic. Customer messaging and predictive work should wait until source statuses are stable.
30 days
to install queue, rules, cadence, and first safe automations
4 phases
map, build, pilot, automate selectively
1 upsell path
implementation support after diagnostic roadmap approval
What the audit needs from the client
Inputs required to make the audit real
30-Day Stabilization and Automation Roadmap
Six workstreams, four phases, one operating layer
Workstream / Phase
Days 1-5
Map and define
Days 6-10
Build control layer
Days 11-20
Pilot cadence
Days 21-30
Automate safely
Workflow design
Confirm current-state path
- Trace sampled exception orders.
- Identify handoffs and rework loops.
- Lock exception categories.
Design future-state flow
- Define queue entry points.
- Map category to owner.
- Set resolution codes.
Pilot with live exceptions
- Run real issues through queue.
- Adjust ambiguous categories.
- Remove duplicate steps.
Lock v1 operating model
- Freeze field definitions.
- Publish workflow SOP.
- Define phase-2 backlog.
Data / systems
Inventory source systems
- Shopify, 3PL, spreadsheet.
- Identify shared order key.
- List data gaps.
Create tracker fields
- Order ID, category, owner.
- Status, SLA age, next action.
- Customer impact and resolution.
Build dashboard view
- Open risk.
- Aging and blocked issues.
- Owner load and trend view.
Automate low-risk signals
- Daily digest.
- SLA aging alerts.
- Owner reminder rules.
People / ownership
Interview stakeholders
- Founder/COO.
- Ops and CS leads.
- 3PL and admin inputs.
Assign decision rights
- Who owns each category.
- Who can close issues.
- Who approves escalation.
Run daily exception review
- 15-minute cadence.
- Oldest/highest-impact first.
- Next action confirmed.
Shift founder role
- Founder sees thresholds.
- Routine issues stay owned.
- Weekly trend readout only.
Customer communication
Review message failures
- Where customers waited.
- Where CS lacked language.
- Where internal detail leaked.
Define safe statuses
- Investigating.
- Awaiting 3PL action.
- Replacement/refund decision.
Pilot CS templates
- Use status-driven language.
- Keep internal detail out.
- Track response timeliness.
Automate prompts, not replies
- Alert CS when update needed.
- Keep human approval.
- No AI-generated replies yet.
Automation readiness
Classify candidates
- Rule-based.
- Judgment-based.
- Human-only.
Define automation gates
- Stable category.
- Known owner.
- Reliable status field.
Test with real exceptions
- False positives.
- Missed cases.
- Manual override points.
Launch safe v1 automations
- Routing.
- Aging alerts.
- Daily digest.
Leadership visibility
Define founder pain
- Which issues pull founder in.
- What decisions only founder can make.
- What should never escalate.
Create threshold rules
- High-dollar/VIP.
- Aging blocked issues.
- Repeat root cause.
Weekly readout
- Open risk summary.
- Trend and root cause.
- Prevention decisions.
Move to strategic review
- Founder reviews patterns.
- Ops owns queue.
- CS owns customer language.
Automation gates
Only automate work that has passed the operating-system test
1. Stable trigger
The workflow has a reliable signal that starts the work, such as a 3PL hold, inventory mismatch, or SLA age threshold.
2. Known owner
The system can route the issue to a role without debate. If ownership still requires judgment, do not automate routing yet.
3. Safe output
The automated action cannot create customer trust damage. Internal alerts are safer than external customer messages.
Automation readiness by component
What happens in the first 30 days versus later
| Component | Status | Roadmap decision |
| Exception queue creation | First 30 days | Ready once source signal and required fields are defined. |
| Owner assignment | First 30 days | Automate with category-to-owner rules after pilot validation. |
| SLA aging alerts | First 30 days | Low-risk reminder automation with clear thresholds. |
| Daily digest | First 30 days | Useful leadership visibility without founder order-level chasing. |
| Customer update prompts | After pilot | Prompt CS that an update is due; keep human approval. |
| AI customer replies | Not first | Wrong starting point until statuses, templates, and QA are stable. |
| Predictive inventory risk | Later | Requires resolution history and repeated patterns. |
Commercial handoff
How the diagnostic turns into implementation revenue
Entry diagnostic package
$2,500+
Paid audit package includes current-state map, future-state design, roadmap, automation readiness, and implementation quote. Exact price depends on system access, volume of samples, and stakeholder count.
Implementation A
Build exception tracker, fields, owner logic, and status definitions.
Implementation B
Build dashboard and daily/weekly operating cadence.
Implementation C
Create CS templates, SOPs, escalation rules, and training.
Implementation D
Add routing alerts, aging reminders, daily digest, and safe automation.